VISION
Case Study · Food

MelyPremiumChocolate×VisionAgency

We took over ad management and creative production for a premium chocolate brand built around gifting. A campaign calendar tied to gifting periods lifted click-through rate and revenue together; every €1 of spend returned €5.20 in revenue.

2,0MImpressions
+134%CTR Increase
€0.018Cost per Click
5,2xROAS
Mely Premium Chocolate × Vision Agency
SCROLL
SectorFood
ServicePerformance Ads
MarketTürkiye
Brand

About the brand

A premium chocolate brand selling through its own e-commerce site. The range is mostly gift boxes, special-occasion sets and single bars. Most orders are not placed for the buyer's own use; they are bought as a gift for someone else.

When we started, the account had a single sales campaign and the budget flowed the same way all year. Product images were catalogue shots; no creative showed the product being given as a gift. In summer, shipping was suspended to some provinces because of the heat, yet ads kept running there and the spend was wasted.

Why they chose us

The brand's expectation from Vision Agency was clear: an ad calendar that does not miss gifting periods, and creatives that justify a premium price. A chocolate purchase is largely decided on the image; when the product photo is weak, click-through rate drops and cost per click rises. Both had to be fixed.

  • Build a campaign calendar that concentrates budget on gifting periods
  • Raise click-through rate with product and gift-box photography
  • Stop wasted spend in provinces where shipping is suspended
Situation Analysis

The challenges we faced

The difficulty was not in the product itself but in how unevenly demand spread across the year and in the physical shipping conditions of chocolate. Four themes stood out on the advertising side:

[ 01 ]

Buyer and Consumer Differ

The person buying the box usually does not eat the chocolate; they give it away. Targeting people who like chocolate was not enough, so we built separate audiences around gift intent: birthdays, anniversaries and special occasions.

[ 02 ]

Demand Follows the Season

Most order volume clusters around Valentine's Day, Mother's Day and New Year. Spreading the budget evenly across twelve months left the peak underfunded and the quiet months inefficient. There was no date plan behind the campaigns.

[ 03 ]

Heat Limits Shipping

In summer chocolate cannot be shipped above a certain temperature and dispatch stops to some provinces. As long as ads keep running there, clicks do not convert into orders and the spend returns nothing. Location breakdowns had never been used in the campaign setup.

[ 04 ]

Premium Price Left Unexplained

The price sits above the category average, but nothing in the ad explained why. A catalogue photo did not show the cocoa ratio, the filling or the quality of the box, so users found the price high and left. Click-through rate sat at 1,1%.

Strategy

4-phase structure

We tied production and delivery to a single calendar: first we built the creative base, then we distributed budget across gifting periods, we switched retargeting on, and finally we measured each period and carried the result into the next.

01Step 01

Product and Box Photography

We produced macro detail, box-opening and gift-wrap images for every product. Cocoa ratio, filling and packaging quality became readable inside the creative, so the premium price had something visual behind it.

02Step 02

Budget by Gifting Calendar

We opened separate campaigns for Valentine's Day, Mother's Day and New Year. Each period started with ten days of warm-up on interest-based audiences, then the budget moved to the sales campaign for the final five days.

03Step 03

Location Filter and Retargeting

We removed provinces without dispatch from the campaign locations. Site visitors and cart abandoners were shown dynamic product ads; this layer took a fifth of total spend and produced a third of revenue.

04Step 04

End-of-Period Measurement and Carry-Over

At the close of every gifting period we matched ad spend against the site's order revenue, basing the measurement on orders that reached the store rather than on the ad panel's estimate. We recorded which creative and which audience produced the orders, then carried that into the next period's setup.

Results

What we achieved together

Over six months the advertising investment came back at a ROAS of 5.2x. 2.0M impressions produced 52,000 clicks, click-through rate reached 2.6% and cost per click came down to €0.018. The period closed with 298 orders.

Impressions

2,0M

6-month period

CTR Increase

+134%

Cost per Click

€0.018

ROAS

5,2x

revenue ÷ spend

Campaign Breakdown

  • Gifting-period campaigns used 62% of total spend.
  • The retargeting layer alone produced a third of revenue.
  • 24 new creatives went live across the three periods.
  • Provinces with dispatch suspended were removed from campaign locations.

What We Learned

  • Targeting the gift buyer converted more cheaply than targeting chocolate lovers.
  • Concentrating budget on the season produced more revenue than spreading it monthly.
  • Creatives showing product detail doubled the click-through rate.
  • Reflecting the shipping limit in campaign locations removed wasted clicks.

For a premium-priced product, advertising works when it shows the moment of giving rather than the product alone; the calendar has to follow the dates of those moments.

My name isfrom

I'd like to share project info and ads figures

A budget for advertising

Locations to be targeted by the ads

Contact me back at
My phone number